
Coherence of the Incoherence
Edward Omar Moad
Hardback, 392 pages
9781463244972
Ā
Between Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd on Nature and the Cosmos
Ā
The debate recorded in al-GhazÄlÄ«ās Incoherence of the Philosophers, and Ibn Rushdās response in Incoherence of the Incoherence, is one of the most philosophically interesting events in the history of classical Islamic thought. Here, the cutting edge of GhazÄlÄ«ās searching critique meets the depth of Ibn Rushdās philosophical insight in a clash over the innovative synthesis of Aristotelian and Neo-Platonic thought represented chiefly by Ibn SÄ«nÄ. This critical commentary closely analyses and evaluates the arguments deployed by all three parties in the debate, wherein are raised questions about the origin of the universe and the reality of time, possibility, causality, and nature. Where opportunities arise, it actively engages in the discussion by suggesting alternative arguments and philosophical directions. It goes beyond the clichĆ© construal of the Incoherence debate as simply a conflict between faith and reason, exposing it as a genuinely philosophical enterprise and a potential source of fresh perspectives on contemporary discussions in metaphysics and analytic theology.
Product Information
Product Information
Shipping & Returns
Shipping & Returns
Description
Edward Omar Moad
Hardback, 392 pages
9781463244972
Ā
Between Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd on Nature and the Cosmos
Ā
The debate recorded in al-GhazÄlÄ«ās Incoherence of the Philosophers, and Ibn Rushdās response in Incoherence of the Incoherence, is one of the most philosophically interesting events in the history of classical Islamic thought. Here, the cutting edge of GhazÄlÄ«ās searching critique meets the depth of Ibn Rushdās philosophical insight in a clash over the innovative synthesis of Aristotelian and Neo-Platonic thought represented chiefly by Ibn SÄ«nÄ. This critical commentary closely analyses and evaluates the arguments deployed by all three parties in the debate, wherein are raised questions about the origin of the universe and the reality of time, possibility, causality, and nature. Where opportunities arise, it actively engages in the discussion by suggesting alternative arguments and philosophical directions. It goes beyond the clichĆ© construal of the Incoherence debate as simply a conflict between faith and reason, exposing it as a genuinely philosophical enterprise and a potential source of fresh perspectives on contemporary discussions in metaphysics and analytic theology.












